Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Bauer v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03105
Petitioner:
Cyril John Bauer
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nelson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03083
Petitioner:
Scott Nelson
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03082
Petitioner:
Ricky L Hamilton
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Caldwell v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03081
Petitioner:
Charles Caldwell
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Deville v. Melgren et al
as 5:2008cv03076
Plaintiff:
Daniel Deville
Defendant:
Eric F Melgren, Mike Crowell and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03071
Petitioner:
Bennie Clark
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cox v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv03064
Petitioner:
Darryl Cox
Respondent:
United States of America and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Isles v. Chester et al
as 5:2008cv03028
Petitioner:
Kevin J Isles
Respondent:
Claude Chester and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Echtinaw v. Lappin et al
as 5:2008cv03011
Plaintiff:
Adam Echtinaw
Defendant:
Harvey Lappin, Duke Terrell, Claude Chester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Chester
as 5:2007cv03260
Petitioner:
David Thomas Rhodes
Respondent:
Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
