Cases 61 - 70 of 6,250
BROWN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56055
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FIGUEROA et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58820
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NEWMAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55719
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BRANDAU et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv57101
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARDNER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59575
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EVANS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59239
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THROM et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56293
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KHAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55706
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RAMOS et al v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
as 2:2011cv58080
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BARTHOLOMEW, JR et al v. CHARLES KURZ & COMPANY INC.
as 2:2011cv59388
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
CHARLES KURZ & COMPANY INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
