Cases 61 - 70 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00426
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00308
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Contreraz v. Dowe et al
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maryjane Contreraz
Defendant:
FNU Dowe and Burkley Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collett v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Nathan Samuel Collett
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00872
Plaintiff:
Richard Dewray Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Hackford et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Richita Hackford and Opal Hackford
Defendant:
State of Utah, Gary Herbert, Sean D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Hajicek v. Heperi et al
as 2:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
Samantha R. Hajicek
Defendant:
Vernon Heperi, Glory Drake, Lacey Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00500
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
JH Masonry v. Creative Times Day School et al
as 2:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
JH Masonry
Defendant:
Creative Times Day School and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Counter_claimant:
Creative Times Day School and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Counter_defendant:
JH Masonry
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270
Kinekt Design v. One Moment In Time et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kinekt Design
Defendant:
One Moment In Time, Mormon Gift Shop, Latter Day Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
