Cases 61 - 70 of 107
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42023
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY R ELKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36776
Plaintiff:
DARIN ELKINS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33869
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN EDWARDS ELKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34710
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE ELKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15475
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER ELKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARAKAT v. ELKINS et al
as 0:2020cv60052
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ELKINS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BARAKAT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
GROSE et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03260
Plaintiff:
GARY GROSE, THOMAS GORDON, JEREMIAH CUNDIFF and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elkin v. Hunter Warfield, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01124
Defendant:
Camden Royal Palms, LLC and Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Elkin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King v. King
as 3:2018cv01427
Plaintiff:
elkin king
Defendant:
forrest king and Forrest King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELKINS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ELKINS and TERRY ELKINS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
