Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chung v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01596
Plaintiff:
Jae Chung
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc., Midland Funding LLC and Rubin & Rothman LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harris v. Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP et al
as 6:2013cv06135
Plaintiff:
Janaya Harris
Defendant:
Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv07180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In the Matter of the Application of JOHN F. PRITCHARD FOR AN ORDER TO QUASH A SUBPOENA in the Southern District of New York, in a case pending in the Eastern District of Virginia
as 1:2012mc00088
Plaintiff:
Gilbert James
Defendant:
encore Capital Group Inc., et al
Movant:
John F Pritchard
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
