Cases 61 - 70 of 177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Westmoreland et al v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01693
Plaintiff:
Andy Westmoreland and Valerie A. Morris-Westmoreland
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Woide et al v. Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association)
as 6:2015cv01596
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Woide and Susannah C. Woide
Defendant:
Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Battle v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB et al
as 2:2015cv00564
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, Federal National Mortgage Association and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bernice Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keefer v. CitiMortgage et al
as 2:2015cv14256
Plaintiff:
Frank Keefer
Defendant:
CitiMortgage , Paul Ince, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv80968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Anderson v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00888
Plaintiff:
John R. Anderson
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Howell v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 6:2015cv00885
Plaintiff:
Danny B. Howell
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation , Coldwell Banker Home Loans , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
