Cases 61 - 70 of 3,580
LUCAS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86337
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LENZY L. LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RELINSKI v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86363
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORP., JOHN CRANE, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GEORGE RELINSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMPTON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86444
Plaintiff:
JENNIE LEE HAMPTON
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86455
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VANCE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86381
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., CRANE COMPANY, EXXON MOBIL CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH MAE VANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUIN, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86570
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEPHEN GUIN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HINES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86318
Defendant:
VIACOM, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
E.C. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABB, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86528
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS BABB
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86520
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WILSON
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BURTON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86289
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE EARL BURTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
