Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Piccone v. Dept of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2008cv00263
Plaintiff:
Maria Elisa Piccone
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rovelli v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Felice Rovelli
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Dept of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Du et al v. Dept of Homeland Security
as 3:2007cv01884
Plaintiff:
Fuliang Du, Fei Xue and Hao Du
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc, Evelyn Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamoudeh v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2007cv01889
Plaintiff:
Ziad Hamoudeh
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Dept of Homeland Security, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
