Cases 61 - 70 of 769
WILLIQUETTE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67880
Plaintiff:
MYRON WILLIQUETTE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
URBAN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67868
Plaintiff:
GEORGE URBAN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHRISMAN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67858
Plaintiff:
KENNETH N. CHRISMAN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEUMER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67793
Plaintiff:
VIOLA NEUMER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PLASTER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67781
Plaintiff:
MILLARD PLASTER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67879
Plaintiff:
JAMES YOUNG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENEA v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67878
Plaintiff:
CASPER ENEA
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEREK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67848
Plaintiff:
FRANK T. GEREK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHY v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67754
Plaintiff:
FLOYD T. SHY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONDAY v. ACANDS INC
as 2:2010cv67856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. MONDAY
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
