Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Whitfield v. Goodrich Petroleum Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10449
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Goodrich Petroleum Corp., Walter G. Goodrich, Robert C. Turnham, Jr. and others
WHITFIELD v. KRATON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KRATON CORPORATION, DAN F SMITH, SHELLY J BAUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05004
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC., WILLIAM G DEMPSY, JOHN P GROETELAARS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. COLUMBIA PROPERTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05005
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
COLUMBIA PROPERTY TRUST, INC., CONSTANCE B MOORE, CARMEN M BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04917
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC., DOUGLAS R WAGGONER, WILLIAM M FARROW, III and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Whitfield v. Dawson Geophysical Company et al
as 1:2021cv09176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Dawson Geophysical Company, Stephen C. Jumper, Craig W. Cooper and others
Whitfield v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09177
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Jan Carlson, Robert W. Alspaugh and others
Whitfield v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv08718
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Luis A. Clavell Rodriguez, Cari M. Dominguez and others
WHITFIELD v. ACCELERON PHARMA INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04628
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ACCELERON PHARMA INC., FRANCOIS NADER, HABIB DABLE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. KADMON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04605
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KADMON HOLDINGS, INC., TASOS G KONIDARIS, HARLAN W WAKSAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
