Cases filed in New York
Cases 61 - 70 of 93
National Labor Relations Board v. Hunts Point Multi-Service Center
as 1:2011mc00135
Applicant: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Hunts Point Multi-Service Center
Cause Of Action: M 36 National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Metro Interior Demolition, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00254
Respondent: Circle Interior Demolition, Inc., Metro Demolition Contracting Corp., Metro Interior Demolition, Inc. and others
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Bordone
as 1:2011mc00255
Defendant: Maurizo Bordone
Plaintiff: National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Shanghai Cafe Deluxe, Inc.
as 1:2011mc00049
Plaintiff: National Labor Relations Board
Defendant: Shanghai Cafe Deluxe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 36 National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Ji Shiang, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00120
Garnishee: Citibank, N.A
Respondent: Ji Shiang, Inc.
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00659
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
National Labor Relations Board v. Expert Electric, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00645
Defendant: Expert Electric, Inc.
Plaintiff: National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. R&R Hills Food Corp.
as 1:2010mc00429
Plaintiff: National Labor Relations Board
Defendant: R&R Hills Food Corp.
National Labor Relations Board v. Expert Electric, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00251
Defendant: Expert Electric, Inc.
Plaintiff: National Labor Relations Board
Linden v. District Counsel 1707-AFSCME et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02164
Plaintiff: Michael Linden
Defendant: District Counsel 1707-AFSCME , The Sharing Community , Paul Zonderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?