Cases 61 - 70 of 112
State of Idaho v. Phillips
as 4:2010cv00594
Defendant:
Jason Blaine Phillips
Plaintiff:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spaude v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
Brian Robert Spaude
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC., CCA WESTERN PROPERTIES, INC. and Phillip Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Smith
as 1:2010cv00370
Petitioner:
Phillip E Lee
Respondent:
Johanna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Specialty Coating Systems, Inc. v. Boomer et al
as 1:2010cv00348
Special Master:
D Duff McKee
Plaintiff:
Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Warren Phillip Boomer and Kisco Conformal Coating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
William Gray
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez and Leeds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharafi v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00171
Petitioner:
Sahibdat Sharafi
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez and Tim Wencier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flieger v. City of Twin Falls et al
as 1:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Phillip Duane Flieger
Defendant:
City of Twin Falls, Twin Falls County Jail, Twin Falls County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Valdez, et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joslin v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Joslin
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Randy Blades, Shannon Cluney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Videgain v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00104
Petitioner:
Vincent B Videgain
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez and Idaho Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
