Cases 61 - 70 of 770
Aubert et al v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2020cv01834
Petitioner:
Renee Baker and Thad Aubert
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montrail Smith v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 20-16712
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
MONTRAIL D. SMITH
Respondent:
RENEE BAKER, Warden
Max Reed, II v. James Cox, et al
as 19-15476
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON, WEISS, SHANNON MOYLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
REX REED, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAX REED II
Williams v. Garrett et al
as 3:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Tara Carpenter, D. Bequette, N.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renard Polk v. Renee Baker, et al
as 20-16784
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and RAMON OLIVAS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENARD TRUMAN POLK
Craig Titus v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 20-16484
Defendant / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, QUENTIN BYRNES, Dept. Director, ROMEO ARANAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG M. TITUS
Ferrill Volpicelli v. Renee Baker, et al
as 20-16505
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERRILL J. VOLPICELLI
Damian Gonzales v. Renee Baker, et al
as 20-16671
Respondent / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIAN M. GONZALES
Elmajzoub v. Wickham et al
as 3:2020cv00502
Plaintiff:
Said Elmajzoub
Defendant:
Daniels, Ford, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Olsen, III v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 20-16755
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, RENEE BAKER, Warden, ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL HENRY OLSEN III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
