Cases 61 - 70 of 139
Rogers v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Irene Rogers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams v. Sears Roebuck and Co.,
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Roger Adams
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co.,
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330 IRS: Notice & Opportunity for Hearing Before Levy
North Atlantic Imports et al v. Thornley et al
as 1:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
North Atlantic Imports , Cache Sales and Roger Dahle
Defendant:
David Thornley and Lifestyle Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Rogers v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00902
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Rogers
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rojos-Rogers et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 2:2012cv00644
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Rojos-Rogers and Greg P. Rogers
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. United States Office Personnel Management
as 2:2012cv00500
Plaintiff:
Andrea Rogers
Defendant:
United States Office Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00409
Plaintiff:
Brian B. Tucker
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, Kurt Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaeme v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
Franklin Capital, Franklin Resources, Franklin Advisors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Giles Construction v. Tooele Inventory Solution et al
as 2:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Giles Construction
Defendant:
Tooele Inventory Solution, Roger C. Earl, Karla A. Domire and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Klein v. Shaffner et al
as 2:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Keith Shaffner, Estate of Mildred Rogers, Rex Shaffner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
