Cases 61 - 70 of 353
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WALSH v. CORDOBA GANDARA et al
as 3:2022cv01862
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
BENJAMIN CORDOBA GANDARA and ELTON NASCMENTO DA SILVA
WALSH v. CORDOBA GANDARA et al
as 2:2022cv01862
Petitioner:
Secretary of Labor MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
BENJAMIN CORDOBA GANDARA and ELTON NASCMENTO DA SILVA
WALSH v. AMA STAFFING SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01786
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor MARTIN J. WALSH and MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
AMA STAFFING SERVICES LLC, OPTION STAFFING SVC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PEDRO CARBAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
