Cases 61 - 70 of 859
Avenue of the Arts, LLC v. M&T Bank, NA, et al
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Avenue of the Arts, LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank, NA,, Internal Revenue Service, Joseph E. Carbonell, III and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Yarborough v. Hudson et al
as 1:2022cv01573
Plaintiff:
David T. Yarborough
Defendant:
Detective Monroe Hudson, Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01553
Petitioner:
James T. Clark
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Akouos, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
Akouos, Inc., Edwards T. Mathers, Kush Parmar and others
Parker v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
Lance L. Parker
Defendant:
Robert May, Department of Corrections, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Accelerant Twister, LLC et al v. Marjo, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Accelerant Twister, LLC and Accelerant Holding, LLC
Defendant:
Marjo, LLC and John T. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Averon US, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Averon US, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and ZenKey LLC
Dixon v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01322
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Parker v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Lance L. Parker
Defendant:
Warden Robert May, Delaware Department of Corrections, Delaware Department of Corrections Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Exterran Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01274
Plaintiff:
Adam Walker
Defendant:
Exterran Corporation, Mark R. Sotir, Andrew J. Way and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
