Cases 61 - 70 of 24,205
Martin v. Attorney General of the United States
as 5:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Maria Navarro Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nelson, Rodney v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv23278
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lamar Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smerling, Elliot v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv23283
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Elliot Smerling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grant v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv02029
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Victor Ricardo Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kalemi v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv02033
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Fatjon Kalemi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RICH et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2024cv00385
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CORPS OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
Plaintiff:
CHANDRA JO RICH and DAVID EUGENE RICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024mc23198
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
