Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Adams v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Agnes Lynn Adams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinette v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 7:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brenda Robinette
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Lonzetta Cleveland
Counter_claimant:
Lonzetta Cleveland
Counter_defendant:
Teresa Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mershon v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Mershon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blum v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
Carolynn C. Blum
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Meza v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00295
Plaintiff:
Donna Meza
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haney v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 0:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Haney
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Roy Campbell and Roy Campbell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Freytes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Freytes and Jennifer Freytes
Defendant:
Fuqing Yongchao Shoes Leather Goods Co., LTD, Fuqing Yongchao Shoes Leather Goods Co., LTD, Claims Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Eubank v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Greg Eubank
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
