Cases 61 - 70 of 25,016
Graham v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Kyle Graham
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Babbino et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Babbino and Christina Babbino
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Quigley et al v. Future Motion Inc.
as 5:2024cv02301
Plaintiff:
Daniella Quigley and Joshua Denning
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hester et al v. Future Motion Inc.
as 5:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Paul Hester and Kelley Hester
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neratko v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02303
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neratko
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Putnam County School District v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02273
Plaintiff:
Putnam County School District
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Bytedance Ltd, ByteDance Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Jumio, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
Jumio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fraser v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Jordan Fraser
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
REBECCA MITCHELL
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC and LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Welton v. Santa Rosa Community Health- Dutton Campus et al
as 3:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Lana Welton
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Community Health- Dutton Campus and Cynthia Hom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
