Cases 71 - 80 of 5,556
Hicks v. Supreme Court
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Mark Henry Hicks
Defendant:
Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fulmer v. Dexter Axle Company LLC
as 1:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Susan Fulmer
Defendant:
Dexter Axle Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
West Shore Home, LLC v. Chapman
as 1:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
West Shore Home, LLC
Defendant:
Bryan Chapman
Jackson v. Aragon Advertising, LLC
as 4:2023mc00812
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lillman v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
John Lillman
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Everett v. Exact Care Pharmacy, LLC
as 4:2023cv01649
Plaintiff:
Brenda Everett
Defendant:
Exact Care Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Williams et al v. FCA US LLC
as 4:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Harry E Williams, III and Alysse R Williams
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wilson v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Geneen Wilson
Defendant:
Ability Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schuchmann v. Great American Power, LLC
as 3:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Wendy Schuchmann
Defendant:
Great American Power, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
