Cases 71 - 80 of 798
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
as 1:2020cv00045
Plaintiff:
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LOTTE GLOBAL LOGISTICS (NORTH AMERICA), INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LOTTE GLOBAL LOGISTICS (NORTH AMERICA), INC. and HYUNDAI INTERMODAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2019cv03574
Defendant:
EUGENE SCALIA, U.S. OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff:
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CLOUDFLARE, INC.
as 1:2019mc00204
Interested Party:
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
In Re:
CLOUDFLARE, INC.
IN RE: NAMECHEAP
as 1:2019mc00203
Interested Party:
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
In Re:
NAMECHEAP
MCLEAN et al v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, COUNTRY OF 1924 TO PRESENT PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF RUSSIA et al
as 1:2019cv03312
Defendant:
INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY, FACEBOOK, INC., URANIUM ONE GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LOUIS FANNING, SR., ESTATE OF JAMES MCLEAN and VICKI FANNING MCLEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TONIC DOMAINS CORP.
as 1:2019mc00182
In Re:
TONIC DOMAINS CORP.
Interested Party:
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
CLOUDFLARE, INC.
as 1:2019mc00181
Interested Party:
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
In Re:
CLOUDFLARE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
