Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 112
SLAGLE et al v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66702
Plaintiff: RICKY SLAGLE, LESLIE SLAGLE and NORA SLAGLE
Defendant: ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
HARRIS v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66598
Plaintiff: ROGER HARRIS
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOLTER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66601
Plaintiff: HOWARD HOLTER
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: A.H. BENNETT COMPANY
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DOCKTER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66586
Plaintiff: ARNOLD DOCKTER
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FLECK v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66590
Plaintiff: ALPHONE FLECK
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILLER v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66608
Plaintiff: ARNOLD MILLER
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES,INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES,INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JEFFRIES v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66603
Plaintiff: KENNETH JEFFRIES
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MORRELL v. A.P.I., INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv66564
Plaintiff: STEPHEN MORRELL
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
UNSER v. A.P.I., INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv66574
Plaintiff: FRANK UNSER
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
HANSON v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66549
Plaintiff: LESLIE HANSON
Defendant: A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?