Cases 71 - 80 of 166
Christopher Langdon et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08978
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Langdon and Deborah Langdon
Kelly F Hillin v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08662
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly F Hillin
Daniel Brogan et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08373
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brogan and Wendy Brogan
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Mary Johnson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08291
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Heyward Johnson and Mary Johnson
Chad Streible v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08296
Defendant:
BTG Medical, Inc., DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Streible
David Addi et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08216
Plaintiff:
David Addi and Jackie Addi
Defendant:
BTG Medical Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Joshua Davis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08217
Plaintiff:
Gayle Davis and Joshua Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Keith Hicks et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08223
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anita Hicks and Keith Hicks
Dortha Fauci et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08222
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dortha Fauci and James A Fauci
Mary Chapman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08166
Plaintiff:
Mary Chapman
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
