Cases 71 - 80 of 3,580
MILLER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86352
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, 3M, D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALLEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86373
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., VIACOM, INC., D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCY L. TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VISSER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86518
Plaintiff:
JOHAN VISSER
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DRUM, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86558
Plaintiff:
GLEN EARL DRUM
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRANKS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86564
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE FRANKS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HATTEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86910
Plaintiff:
EZRA RAY HATTEN
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CHILDRESS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86290
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, D.B. RILEY, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN B. CHILDRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86329
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86384
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MOTLEY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RILEY, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86587
Plaintiff:
JAMES FULTON RILEY
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
