Cases 71 - 80 of 243
MACINTOSH v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv05070
Plaintiff:
JANE S. MACINTOSH
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
HORSTING v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv05022
Plaintiff:
ELLEN T. HORSTING
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
DIPRENDA v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv04946
Plaintiff:
LOUANN DIPRENDA
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
DIPRENDA v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv04946
Plaintiff:
LOUANN DIPRENDA
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
COHEN v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv04927
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS COHEN
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
COHEN v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv04927
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS COHEN
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
YOUNG v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv04842
Plaintiff:
ERINN YOUNG
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
PURPURI v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv04719
Plaintiff:
JAMES PURPURI
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
BANNON v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2014cv04605
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. BANNON
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
BANNON v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv04605
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. BANNON
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
