Cases 71 - 75 of 75
Georgia-Pacific LLC v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
as 1:2007cv01460
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific LLC and Georgia-Pacific LLC
Defendant:
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Mendola v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation
as 1:2007cv00998
Plaintiff:
Peter Mendola
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Central Savannah River Area TMDL Group et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
Central Savannah River Area TMDL Group, Central Savannah River Area TMDL Group, Central Savannah River Area TMDL Group and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Importers Service Corporation v. Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Importers Service Corporation and Importers Service Corporation
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc., Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. and Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc., Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc., Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Importers Service Corporation, Importers Service Corporation, Importers Service Corporation and others
Linder v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00681
Plaintiff:
Joseph Linder
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
