Cases 71 - 80 of 188
MONTGOMERY v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03163
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAINES v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03153
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. GAINES
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
GAINES v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03153
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. GAINES
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEMARA v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03152
Plaintiff:
TREVOR M. DEMARA
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
EATON v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03164
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. EATON
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
DEMARA v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03152
Plaintiff:
TREVOR M. DEMARA
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHESNICK v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY CHESNICK
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
BOATRIGHT v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-03115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BOATRIGHT
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
BOATRIGHT v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BOATRIGHT
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVENDAHL v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02993
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EVENDAHL
Defendant:
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC. , ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. and WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
