Cases 71 - 80 of 788
Liu v. Session
as 18-2005
Petitioner:
Meiling Liu
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-1986
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States
Yao v. Sessions
as 18-1979
Petitioner:
Qiumei Yao
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Khan v. Sessions
as 18-1982
Petitioner:
Rahul Amin Khan
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-1985
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States
Singh v. Sessions
as 18-1968
Petitioner:
Parwinder Singh
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Wang v. Session
as 18-1959
Petitioner:
Lizhui Wang
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Eldemerdash v. Session
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
Mohamed Khaled Eldemerdash, AKA Mohammed Eldemerdash, AKA Mohammed Khaled El Demerdash
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Singh v. Session
as 18-1957
Petitioner:
Dmarminder Singh, AKA Dharminder Singh
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Phanchoulidze v. Sessions
as 18-1967
Petitioner:
George Phanchoulidze
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
