Cases 71 - 80 of 120
Whitfield v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09177
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Jan Carlson, Robert W. Alspaugh and others
Whitfield v. MGM Growth Properties LLC et al
as 1:2021cv08110
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
MGM Growth Properties LLC, Paul Salem, Thomas Roberts and others
WHITFIELD v. KADMON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04605
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KADMON HOLDINGS, INC., TASOS G KONIDARIS, HARLAN W WAKSAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. STAMPS.COM INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04094
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STAMPS.COM INC., KEN MCBRIDE, MOHAN P ANANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Byerly v. Contango Oil & Gas Company et al
as 1:2021cv07327
Plaintiff:
Gerald Byerly
Defendant:
CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY, John C. Goff, Lon McCain and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein, Matthew Whitfield and Clarissa Provost
Consolidated Defendant:
Independence Energy LLC, IE Opco LLC, IE PubCo Inc. and others
WHITFIELD v. TREMONT MORTGAGE TRUST et al
as 2:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TREMONT MORTGAGE TRUST, JOHN L HARRINGTON, MATTHEW P JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMUEL ZELL, DAVID M BARSE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Whitfield v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07244
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Jan Carlson, Robert W. Alspaugh and others
WHITFIELD v. RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04390
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
RETAIL PROPERTIES OF AMERICA, INC., GERALD M GORSKI, BONNIE S BIUMI and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Whitfield v. QAD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06674
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
QAD, Inc., Anton Chilton, Pamela M. Lopker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
