Cases 71 - 80 of 243
GLOBIG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67759
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE GLOBIG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LONG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67782
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D LONG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CERTAINTED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNAEBE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67881
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVE KNAEBE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67812
Plaintiff:
DONALD JOHNSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAPRESTO v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67870
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LAPRESTO
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LA ROCQUE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67866
Plaintiff:
CALVIN LA ROCQUE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANKLAM v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67897
Plaintiff:
CARL F ANKLAM
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAST v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv67775
Plaintiff:
LLOYD E GAST
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , CERTAINTEED CORPORATION , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEHR v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67876
Plaintiff:
DIETRICH FEHR
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LURA v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67765
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. LURA
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
