Cases 71 - 80 of 786
Bancroft v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09878
Plaintiff:
William Bancroft
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Michael C. Jennings, Franklin Myers and others
Megginson v. The Bridge Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09626
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Megginson
Defendant:
The Bridge Inc., Danniella Belle, Makiala Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09497
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Franklin Myers, Michael C. Jennings and others
Abrams v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09309
Plaintiff:
Jared Abrams
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Franklin Myers, Anne-Marie N. Ainsworth and others
Lovoi v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv08805
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Michael C. Jennings, Franklin Myers and others
Hughes v. Trillium Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05768
Plaintiff:
Ian Hughes
Defendant:
Trillium Therapeutics Inc., Luke Beshar, Michael Kamarck and others
Smith v. Trillium Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08520
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Trillium Therapeutics Inc., Jan Skvarka, Luke Beshar and others
Jones v. Trillium Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08472
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Trillium Therapeutics Inc., Luke Beshar, Jan Skvarska and others
Parshall v. Trillium Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08454
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
Trillium Therapeutics Inc., Luke Beshar, Jan Skavarska and others
SM Merger/Arbitrage, L.P. et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2021cv08255
Plaintiff:
SM Merger/Arbitrage, L.P., SM Investors, L.P., SM Investors II, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Giovanni Caforio, Ph.D Vicki L. Sato and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
