Cases 71 - 80 of 287
LOZANO PENA v. BARRIENTOS RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2017mc02427
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL LOZANO PENA
Defendant:
JOSE FELIPE BARRIENTOS RODRIGUEZ and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MULDROW v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
LEALON (AMIR MUSA) MULDROW
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS KANE, IAN CONNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ-CANETE v. BOQUIN BANEGAS et al
as 1:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
JESUS SANCHEZ-CANETE
Defendant:
MIRIAN Y. BOQUIN BANEGAS, SUANY LISSETH CARDENAS BOQUIN, ANA CASTILLO MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MAQBOOL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD Q. MAQBOOL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PATEL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
BHAVIN H. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
