Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Santander Consumer USA Inc v. Maywood Motors Inc
as 3:2016cv02499
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA Inc
Defendant:
Maywood Motors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santander Consumer USA Inc v. Union Pontiac-GMC Inc
as 3:2016cv02420
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA Inc
Defendant:
Union Pontiac-GMC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Noble et al v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
as 4:2016cv01619
Plaintiff:
Curtis Noble , Iris Delgado and James Simpson
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Haase v. Elliott et al
as 4:2015cv03473
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan Haase
Defendant:
Brady Elliott, Fort Bend County, Roy L Cordes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Bailey v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00912
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Ginger Milonis Nevala, et al v. Lone Star North Loop Ltd., et al
as 5:2015cv00884
Defendant:
Lone Star North Loop Ltd. and Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrina Nevala and Ginger Milonis Nevala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Santander Consumer USA Inc v. Quirk
as 3:2015cv02590
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA Inc
Defendant:
Daniel J. Quirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fontenot v. Santander Consumer USA Inc et al
as 4:2015cv01884
Plaintiff:
Timmy Fontenot
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc , Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , Ocwen Financial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
