Cases 71 - 80 of 98
MCFADDEN v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01198
Petitioner:
TRACY MCFADDEN
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURNEY v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01189
Petitioner:
JAMES BURNEY
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARTER v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2010cv01187
Petitioner:
MYRON CARTER
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ERIC HOLDER and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv00605
Plaintiff:
ERIC LEWIS
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, BUREAU OF PRISONS, D.C. SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BROWN v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv00546
Petitioner:
BILLY BROWN
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMMETT v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv00442
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MICHAEL HAMMETT, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and SIMON WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PRESTON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
EDWIN PRESTON
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YOUNG v. JOHNS et al
as 1:2009cv01847
Petitioner:
REGINALD V. YOUNG
Respondent:
TRACY JOHNS and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAILEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2009cv01260
Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR.,, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.