Cases 71 - 80 of 1,142
Thompson v. Home Point Capital Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Home Point Capital Inc., Andrew Bon Salle, William Newman and others
Webb Jr. v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
William J Webb Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Renee Hrivnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Finger v. Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Radius Global Infrastructure, Inc., William H. Berkman, Michael D. Fascitelli and others
Ballard v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Ballard v. Cvent Holding Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Cvent Holding Corp., Rajeev K. Aggarwal, David Breach and others
Pherigo et al v. Sitel Operating Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Pherigo, Tierra Hunt, Shrine Williams and others
Defendant:
Sitel Operating Corporation, Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Alpine Access, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Docebo NA, Inc. v. Keller Williams Realty Inc.
as 1:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Docebo NA, Inc.
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Erwin v. SH1 Holdco LLC
as 1:2023cv00414
Counter Defendant:
William Cody Erwin
Counter Claimant:
SH1 Holdco LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Morgan v. Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Scott R. Ward, Martha G. Aronson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
