Cases 71 - 80 of 1,539
Martial v. Department of Defense
as 2:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
Jean P. Martial
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Maehr v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T. Maehr
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
God's Storehouse Topeka Church v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv04014
Petitioner:
God's Storehouse Topeka Church
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
United States of America v. Davison et al
as 2:2022cv02059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Allen R. Davison, Sharon L. Davison, BALD Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
AllNations Bank v. Phillips et al
as 5:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
AllNations Bank
Defendant:
Terry Waynne Phillips, David W Phillips, Sr, David Waynne Phillips, II and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502
Martial v. Department of Defense
as 2:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
Jean P. Martial
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Nicolls et al v. USA
as 1:2021cv03331
Plaintiff:
C. Robert Nicolls and Kathleen M. Nicolls
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Harpole et al
as 1:2021cv01120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jerry E Harpole, Deborah L Harpole and San Juan County
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Cabelka
as 5:2021mc00007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry Cecil Cabelka
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lawrence J Smith, Lori T Smith and Lori Smith, DDS, Inc. P.C.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
