Cases 71 - 80 of 103
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2010cv00273
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and Atoka County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Lillian Mingo, Della Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0357 Condemnation of lands under laws of States
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Joyce Ann Yahola Core and Asi Yahola
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0357 Condemnation of lands under laws of States
KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2009cv00684
Plaintiff:
KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc., KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc., KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Oklahoma v. Small Business Administration et al
as 4:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma and State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Small Business Administration, Crow Real Estate Investments, LLC, Crow Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the West Half (W/2) of Section 34, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M. and the Northwest Quarter (NW/4) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00299
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in the West Half (W/2) of Section 34, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M. and the Northwest Quarter (NW/4) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma and Riverbend Ranch, LP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the North Half (N/2) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma
as 6:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in the North Half (N/2) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma and Foster OK Resources L.P. of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in Southwest Quarter (SW/4) aka Lot 7, of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 6, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in Southwest Quarter (SW/4) aka Lot 7, of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 6, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma, Rickey Hugh Raney, Johnny Life Raney, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 17, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 17, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma, Brad Raney and Farm Service Administration, United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown et al v. Oklahoma Department of Transportation
as 5:2008cv00699
Plaintiff:
Russell L Brown and Phyllis H Brown
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
