Cases 71 - 80 of 2,343
Schmidt et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance
as 2:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Marci Schmidt and Darin Rohead
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hashakimana v. Hexel
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Tito Hashakimana
Defendant:
Hexel and Hexcel
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Nechvatal v. Verdi
as 2:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nechvatal
Defendant:
Andrew Verdi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Makayla Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jessop v. Smiths Food and Drug Centers et al
as 2:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Brooke K. Jessop
Defendant:
Smiths Food and Drug Centers and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Hyatt v. Uintah Basin Medical Center
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Doris Hyatt
Defendant:
Uintah Basin Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hart v. Teasdale
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jordan Hart
Defendant:
Brittany Teasdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Lee v. Starbucks et al
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Deniece Lee
Defendant:
Starbucks and Smith's Food & Drug Centers a foreign corporation doing business as Smith's Marketplace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Neil v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
Scott Neil
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
