Cases 71 - 80 of 270
LOUISIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv00770
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
ALTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00758
Plaintiff:
ALTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00749
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MANASSAS PARK, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
HERZFELD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS
as 1:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
SHMUEL HERZFELD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC.
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BEDFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
BEDFORD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BEDFORD, VIRGINIA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
JEFFERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 7 v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
JEFFERSON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 7
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER and THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
SCHONBERG v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv02040
Plaintiff:
STEVE SCHONBERG
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
STATE OF GEORGIA v. HOLDER
as 1:2010cv01970
Plaintiff:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.