Cases 71 - 80 of 3,046
FRANK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv23020
Plaintiff:
PAIGE M FRANK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CUNHA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv23034
Plaintiff:
AMILCAR CUNHA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SALMONS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv23014
Plaintiff:
MINDY JEAN SALMONS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VELEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22953
Plaintiff:
GUIDO VENGOECHEA VELEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILLS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv22865
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY WILLS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
O'DELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22858
Plaintiff:
DAWN O'DELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STRASHINSKY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv22856
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. STRASHINSKY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SPEIGHT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22806
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA R. SPEIGHT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LAGUER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv22783
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL S. LAGUER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NIETO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv22755
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A NIETO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
