Cases 81 - 90 of 35,826
Agatha Marie Frank v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Agatha Marie Frank
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shamika Nicole Thirsty v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
SHAMIKA NICOLE THIRSTY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00318
Plaintiff:
Johanna Isabel Romo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Richard Godoy Magana v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Richard Godoy Magana
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Romo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Johanna Isabel Romo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Brandy J. Jordan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Juan Carlos Vizaga v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Vizaga
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Bertha Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ruiz v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Miguel Castro Ruiz
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00456
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Bertha Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
