Cases 81 - 90 of 303
Engvoldsen et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ronald T. Engvoldsen and Patricia Engvoldsen
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, the Internal Revenue Service and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2015cv01425
Plaintiff:
Mary W. Thomas
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Sheely et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sheely, Jr. and Felicia A. Boyd-Sheely
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Senn v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Senn
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon and Select Portfolio Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015mi00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014mi00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gilford v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2014cv03808
Plaintiff:
Shannel Gilford
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon , Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Rasheed v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2014cv03599
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Rasheed
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon and McCurdy and Candler, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Valles v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 1:2014cv03565
Plaintiff:
Jude Valles
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
