Cases 81 - 90 of 239
Sanchez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02207
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Miguel Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01933
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Armstrong and GW Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborn et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01934
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Becton Dickinson & Company and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Philip Osborn and Jane Osborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01923
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Brian Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mormello v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01926
Plaintiff:
Gary Mormello
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pullido et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01927
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Seigfried Pullido and Carmen Pullido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pence v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01267
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Becton Dickinson & Company and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ian Pence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorcas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01268
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Alan Dorcas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Escobar et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01269
Plaintiff:
Azucena Escobar and Arturo Escobar
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Streich v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01270
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Becton Dickinson & Company and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Connie Streich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
