Cases 81 - 90 of 241
STRINGER v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. STRINGER
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NANTZ v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05701
Plaintiff:
LISA NANTZ
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAISON et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2015cv05597
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. FAISON and TRACE G. SNOWDEN
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP., C.R. BARD, INC. and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EUDY et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03037
Plaintiff:
ETTIE E. EUDY and GARY EUDY
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAUER v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02129
Plaintiff:
JUDY B. LAUER
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUGH et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01892
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY ANN HOUGH and JASON HOUGH
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.R. BARD, INC. v. SOFRADIM PRODUCTION
as 2:2015cv01463
Plaintiff:
C.R. BARD, INC.
Defendant:
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LIFEPORT SCIENCES LLC v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05513
Plaintiff:
LIFEPORT SCIENCES LLC
Defendant:
C.R. BARD INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
FOX v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02790
Plaintiff:
NORMA FOX
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAIR et al v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01369
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA FAIR and WILEY C. FAIR
Defendant:
C.R. BARD INC., COVIDIEN PLC, COVIDIEN LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
