Cases 81 - 90 of 127
McCarthy et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 5:2013cv03207
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McCarthy and Terence McCarthy
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon, LLC, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sandra Horridge et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04018
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Dima, S.L., Neomedic, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Horridge and Sandra Horridge
Anderson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2012at01615
Plaintiff:
Mei Ling Anderson and Renee Anderson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGahan v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv02998
Plaintiff:
Crystal McGahan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Revell et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02846
Plaintiff:
Marita Revell and Neil Revell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soss et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05408
Plaintiff:
Barbara Soss and Burton Soss
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Coloplast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Salas et al v. C.R Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05405
Plaintiff:
Wanda Salas and Jesus Salas
Defendant:
C.R Bard, Inc. and Coloplast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
William Caldwell et al v. Craig Owen et al
as 5:2012cv01350
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc, Crown Surgery Medical Group, Davol Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Quinn Caldwell and William Caldwell
Bass et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02792
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Bass and Timothy G. Bass
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01661
Plaintiff:
Katherine Franklin and Scott Franklin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
