Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Nolasco v. Daynes et al
as 2:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Nolasco
Defendant:
Richard W. Daynes, David G. Christensen and Benjamin C. McMurray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Western Rangeland Conservation Association et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Western Rangeland Conservation Association , Pearson Ranch , Yardley Cattle and others
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Neil Kornze and Juan Palma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Christensen v. MediaOne of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Christensen
Defendant:
MediaOne of Utah and Interstate Collections
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hamilton v. Walters et al
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tony Alexander Hamilton
Defendant:
Pete Walters, Scott L. Christensen, Alfred C. Bigelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TDJ Inc v. Christensen SA et al
as 2:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
TDJ Inc
Defendant:
Christensen SA and Sassan Safa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Christensen et al v. Target
as 2:2013cv01136
Plaintiff:
Nellie Christensen , Stephanie Wright , Jennifer Christensen and others
Defendant:
Target
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Christensen v. State of Utah
as 1:2013cv00093
Petitioner:
Reed K. Christensen
Respondent:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Benson et al
as 2:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
James W. Edwards
Defendant:
Kirk A. Benson, EJ Garn, Raymond J. Weller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Garman v. Garaycochea et al
as 2:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
John Paul Garman
Defendant:
Marcos Garaycochea, Hilary Gordon and Derek Christensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
