Cases 81 - 90 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kostal et al v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00789
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, General Refractories Company, Trane US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry J. Kostal and Rosemary Kostal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blakey v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01318
Defendant:
Caterpillar Retirement Income Plan Benefit Committee, Caterpillar Retirement Income Plan and Caterpillar Inc
Plaintiff:
Margaret Blakey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Foster v. AW Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00663
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Foster
Defendant:
AW Chesterton, Inc., Advance Auto Parts Inc, Allied Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hlatko v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 1:2009cv04219
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Hlatko
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Schlicksup v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01208
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Schlicksup
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc., David B Burritt, Alice Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.