Cases 81 - 90 of 169
BRADBERRY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv02362
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRADBERRY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC , GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MERGENER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01417
Plaintiff:
DONALD MERGENER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TEARE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
as 2:2011cv00749
Plaintiff:
JAMES TEARE and NANCY TEARE
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC et al
as 2:2011cv00773
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. MURPHY, III
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Movant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEE v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE et al
as 2:2011cv00490
Plaintiff:
DENNIS LEE
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE GLAXO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
as 2:2011cv00487
Plaintiff:
RANDY ALLEN and ISIS ALLEN
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACLIN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
as 2:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
DORA MACLIN
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KECSKEMETY et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC.
as 2:2011cv00488
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KECSKEMETY and PATRICIA KECSKEMETY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OTERO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC et al
as 2:2010cv07163
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO OTERO and MELINDA SANTIAGO-OTERO
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Movant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACOB et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC et al
as 2:2010cv07164
Plaintiff:
TONYA JACOB and WILLIAM JACOB
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Movant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
