Cases 81 - 90 of 109
COLLINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES et al
as 1:2012cv01017
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUGH COLLINGTON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, DC DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and RICO HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINGTON v.DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, et al.,
as 1:2012cv00879
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUGH COLLINGTON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and BIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH , SHELETHIA SMITH , ALETHIA STATON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
CHAVEZ et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
ANA CHAVEZ , KATHY CANNON , ROBIN BELL and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
STRONG et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00353
Plaintiff:
MICAIAH STRONG , M. S. , DORIS WOOD and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
ROBINSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ROBINSON , ANTHNOY PRICE , BERNICE BROWN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
STARLING v. LAWSON
as 1:2011cv02080
Plaintiff:
EDWARD STARLING
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00197
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA HUGHES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Congressional Accountability Act
HILLIARD v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, et al.,
as 1:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MICHAEL HILLIARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, LYNN N. HUGHES, MELINDA HARMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
