Cases 81 - 90 of 128
Duty v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
James S Duty
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Gail R Butler
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ann D Ellis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bond v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00293
Plaintiff:
Robert J Bond
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00291
Plaintiff:
Martha S Cecil
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buchanan v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Buchanan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00289
Plaintiff:
Karen H Barnett
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Herman Thompson and Annette Thompson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grandberry-Morrow v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lorita Grandberry-Morrow
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
